Archive for the 'Aramaic' Category

Jun 20 2011

The Genetic Relationship of Aramaic & Hebrew

Published by under Aramaic

Two recent articles from well-respected news agencies have included fallacious details about the relationship between Hebrew and Aramaic. The first described the Aramaic dialect spoken in the first century of the Common Era as “a language which developed from the classical Hebrew of the scriptures, a few hundred years earlier,” and the second claimed that Aramaic is “the linguistic root of modern day Hebrew and Arabic.”

So which one is it? Is Aramaic the root of Hebrew or did Aramaic develop from Hebrew? The answer, of course, is neither. Although they may be related by a shared lineage, there is not a direct genetic relationship between the two. That is to say, one did not derive from the other. (Pete Bekins irascibly assimilates these two absurd statements with the tongue-in-check proposal that “Classical Hebrew developed into Aramaic which then morphed back into Modern Hebrew and Arabic.”)

These languages are indeed quite similar—a reasonable modern analogy may be the modern Romance languages—but they are not genetically related. Like Italian and French which share a common progenitor in Latin, Aramaic and Hebrew are related to one another by shared heritage and not direct linage. Almost without exception in modern scholarship, this common progenitor of Aramaic and Hebrew (called [Proto ]Northwest Semitic) is agreed upon. (For an example of some of the difficulties of establishing direct relationships between languages, in particular modern Aramaic dialects, see here.)

For more discussion see any introduction to comparative Semitic grammar or one of many introductory articles/books to this topic. For example:

Faber, Alice. 1997. “Genetic Subgrouping of the Semitic Languages.” Pp. 3-15. In The Semitic Languages, edited by R. Hetzron, London: Routledge, 1997. (overview here)

Huehnergard, John. 2005. Features of Central Semitic. In Biblical and Oriental Essays in Memory of William L. Moran, edited by A. Gianto. Rome: Biblical Pontific Institute. (available online here)

Rubin, Aaron. 2010. A Brief Introduction to the Semitic Languages. Edited by G. A. Kiraz, Gorgias Handbooks 19. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press. (available from Amazon)

One response so far

Oct 11 2010

Product Recommendation: Babel Flashcards

Published by under Aramaic,Tools

If you are struggling to learn Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek vocabulary, there is an exciting new flashcard program from Miklal Software which should be helpful to any language student. 

Babel Flashcards works on all computer platforms with Java and includes card decks which are keyed to major grammars (like Bill Mounce's Basics of Biblical Greek Grammar and more to come) as well as excellent tools to produce card lists based on lexeme frequency, English glosses, part of speech, Biblical passage or any combination thereof!

Several of the other features of this program will be highlighted in future posts, but you can take advantage of a special RELEASE SALE of 20% off with the promo code release1010 for a limited time right now.

One response so far

Jul 08 2010

JSS 2010 Article

Published by under Aramaic

For those interested in such things, the most recent edition (Autumn 2010) of the Journal of Semitic Studies contains an article which I co-authored: "A Revised Reading of a Nabataean Inscription from Umm Al-Jimal"

Happy reading!

No responses yet

Jul 06 2010

Languages of Jesus

Published by under Aramaic,Grammar,Greek

Mark Roberts has posted an intriguing article, What Language(s) Did Jesus Speak? The Circumstantial Evidence.  The content of the article proposes a not too unusual answer–Aramaic and possibly Hebrew and/or Greek.  He seems to be more keen on the idea of Jesus speaking Greek instead of Hebrew, but nonetheless capitulates that Hebrew is a possibility. 
 
There are several problems with such a suggestion, not the least of which is that saying Jesus spoke "Aramaic" or "Hebrew" (or even for that matter "Greek") is not really telling us what language he spoke.  Aramaic was not a single linguistic unit in the first century: what is generally labeled "Aramaic" includes a very wide range of languages and dialects.  A similar problem arises for the Hebrew of the first century–when comparing the evidence from two examples closest to first century Hebrew, the Dead Sea Scrolls and Tannaitic literature, one finds quite divergent characteristics.  (Even though I am no expert, there is evidence for different linguistic strata within Greek as well.) 
 
Further, there is very scant evidence not only for the linguistic community in which he was raised (which the article does well to point out), but the internal evidence within the NT is limited to only a handful of "Aramaic" sayings which do not provide enough data to assess definitively the appropriate dialect/language of one particular individual (setting aside the idiolect problem).
 
So what can we say about the language(s) of Jesus?  The NT evidence points to a dialect of Aramaic, but at our present knowledge of first century Aramaic it would be pure supposition to move too far beyond this point.
 
UPDATE: Roberts on Jesus' use of Hebrew

No responses yet