Comments on: Exodus Manuscript http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/ Daily readings from Biblical Hebrew supplemented with vocabulary and syntax Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:50:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Hardy http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20842 Hardy Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:32:59 +0000 http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/#comment-20842 I have not seen the manuscript; however possibly one of our other readers in Jerusalem may be able to speak to the layout of the final verse. I have not seen the manuscript; however possibly one of our other readers in Jerusalem may be able to speak to the layout of the final verse.

]]> By: ari kinsberg http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20783 ari kinsberg Fri, 08 Jun 2007 04:44:09 +0000 http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/#comment-20783 really cool! do you know if the last verse of the song in this ms. is written as prose or as verse? really cool!

do you know if the last verse of the song in this ms. is written as prose or as verse?

]]> By: Hardy http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20349 Hardy Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:27:04 +0000 http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/#comment-20349 Ah yes. Now that would be a wonderful discovery! Ah yes. Now that would be a wonderful discovery!

]]> By: Jim Getz http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20347 Jim Getz Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:24:20 +0000 http://www.dailyhebrew.com/2007/06/06/exodus-manuscript-2/#comment-20347 I think you've got a bit of wishful thinking leaking into your post. The manuscript is from the 7th-8th centuries CE, not BCE. ;-) I think you’ve got a bit of wishful thinking leaking into your post. The manuscript is from the 7th-8th centuries CE, not BCE. ;-)

]]>